Collaboration Tools

Collaboration Tools let multiple authors work simultaneously while preserving formatting and maintaining a complete version history.

Interface showing 'Validate' warning with 3 issues and an article exceeding word limit by 24 of 300 allowed.

Built for teams across

Features

Beautiful analytics to grow smarter

Powerful, self-serve product and growth analytics to help you convert, engage, and retain more users. Trusted  by over 4,000 startups.

Real-Time Multi-Author Collaboration

Collaborative Manuscript Management

Most multi-author manuscripts move through a familiar and painful cycle: one person edits, sends the file, another edits, sends it back, and somewhere in the middle of this digital ping-pong match, a version gets lost or overwritten.

By the time the manuscript is ready to submit, nobody is entirely sure which draft is current.

Toolbar with icons and buttons: Validate (with warning and count 3), Guidelines, and a blue user add icon.
Interface showing abstract guidelines and a rule deviation warning for exceeding word limit by 24 words.
Shared Authoring Workspace

A Shared Workspace for Research Teams

Every contributor works from the same document in real time. Edits from any author appear immediately, with no file transfers and no version conflicts to untangle.

Threaded comments let reviewers leave feedback directly on specific sentences or paragraphs, keeping discussions tied to the text they reference, rather than scattered across an email chain.

Version Control and Access Management

Complete Visibility Into Every Revision

Formatting stays consistent regardless of who is editing. Changes made by one author don't override the journal's style requirements or disrupt the work of another, which matters particularly when a submission deadline is close and multiple sections are being revised at once.

A complete version history logs every addition, deletion, and edit with timestamps. Teams can review how the manuscript developed, compare earlier drafts, and restore previous versions if a revision doesn't hold up.

Access controls let the document owner assign specific roles: view, comment, or edit. Collaborators get what they need; sensitive unpublished data stays protected.

Rule Deviations report showing citation missing fields and bullet character limit exceeded with occurrences counts.
Purple lightning bolt icon with speed lines on a light purple circular background.

Key Benefits

Icon of a barred circle above a document or spreadsheet symbol on a blue rounded square background.

No more version conflicts

Every author works from a single current document. The file attachment cycle and its attendant confusion are gone.

White flag icon on a rounded square purple background.

Contextual feedback

Comments attach directly to the text they reference, so feedback stays focused and discussions don't get lost in a separate thread.

White stopwatch icon on a rounded blue square background.

Consistent formatting across contributors

Edits from any author work within the established journal style, without introducing formatting inconsistencies that need to be cleaned up later.

White network or nodes icon centered on a rounded blue square background.

Complete version history

Every change is logged, giving the team a full record of how the manuscript evolved and the ability to revert to any previous state.

White sine wave icon on a rounded blue square background.

Granular access controls

Assign view, comment, or edit permissions by contributor, and “freeze” finalized sections to prevent further edits once they've been approved. External reviewers can leave feedback without accessing sections they don't need to see.

Features

See it in action

Work seamlessly across teams without version control breakdowns.

Our reviews

11 out of 10 on journal reformatting. - Senior Medical Writer, Biotech

"This is a gap in the industry that I think would help a lot of people."
Professor and Senior Researcher
"Every individual journal having their own format and guidelines, if we will able to get here without doing much effort in the same format... that will save our time."
Senior Biochemical Engineer
"I like that it's everything all in one place, you know, and not needing to go back and forth between different platforms."
Senior Strategic Medical Writer
"Once we understand the things we can basically do this actually easily... it includes all the aspects that we need for writing a whole manuscript. It's a whole package at one place."
Medical Writer
"I think there's definitely a need for the platform like this... that would save so much time. Format of different journals, I mean, that's the big thing right there."
Senior Medical Writer
"Formulaic would be really, really nice and a big improvement over other platforms."
Computational Biologist
"You know you could make a killing just on this alone... to be able to switch if the manuscript did not go through one particular journal, instead of having to go back and manually reformat everything yourself."
Senior Biomedical Engineer
"When you have to write for a journal, if it gets rejected, and you submit to a new journal, there'll be a lot of corrections to do so. A tool like this would be very helpful."
Freelance Writer
"I think it fills a niche that is lacking in scientific writing. There's no like specific platform that's geared towards scientific writing."
Junior Chemical Researcher
"I will say that the most helpful is all the knowledge that the platform has about the different manuscript different journals, guidelines, and the ability to jump from one to the other."
Lead Scientific Writer at a leading cancer center
"It will be a very good app...it's a solution to many problems in one app only and very easy to handle. I'm definitely looking forward to use it."
Senior Researcher
"I think this is game changer in terms of scientific writing, because most people just open the word document and they don't know where to start, even though they have the journal in mind. But here you can have already the subsections and all that."
Senior Medical Writer

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about our product.

Can external collaborators access the document without full editing rights?

Read-only or comment-only permissions can be granted for any collaborator.

Is it possible to see exactly which author contributed which specific section of the text?

Accountability is maintained through detailed logs that attribute every character to the specific user account that typed it.

How many people can edit a document at the same time?

Formulaic supports up to a maximum of 50 simultaneous editors on a single document.

Can I see who else is working on the document?

Yes. You will see colored cursors representing each active user. Their name or initials will appear next to their cursor, and a list of active collaborators is displayed in the top-right corner of the editor.

What happens if two people type in the exact same spot?

Our system uses Operational Transformation (OT) to resolve conflicts in real-time. Changes are merged instantly based on the precise timestamp of the keystroke, ensuring that no text is overwritten or lost during simultaneous typing.

How often is my work saved?


The document saves automatically every few seconds as long as you have an active internet connection. Every major editing session is also archived as a "Version" in the history log. You also have an option of doing a Manual save by clicking on the save button from the Global toolbar.

Can I restore a previous version without losing the current one?

Yes. When viewing a past version, you have three options:
1. Rename: You can change the name of a draft version.
2. Restore Version: Will restore a previous version of the manuscript to be the active version
3. Delete: You can delete a version from the library.