Built for teams across
Beautiful analytics to grow smarter
Powerful, self-serve product and growth analytics to help you convert, engage, and retain more users. Trusted by over 4,000 startups.
From Draft to Submission-Ready
The journey from a completed manuscript to a published article is often obstructed by the meticulous and ever-changing requirements of academic journals.
Our Compliance Validation tool is designed to bridge this gap, serving as an intelligent safeguard that ensures your manuscript is submission-ready the moment you finish drafting.


Ensure Every Requirement Is Met as You Draft
By integrating directly into your drafting workflow, the tool performs instantaneous checks against a comprehensive database of journal-specific guidelines.
Whether it is strict word counts, specific citation styles, formatting for figures and tables, or required disclosure statements, the tool identifies discrepancies immediately.
Instead of waiting weeks for a desk rejection due to technical errors, you receive proactive alerts that flag violations as they occur.
Actionable Compliance Guidance
This feature does more than just spot errors; it provides actionable feedback to help you rectify issues on the fly. By automating the tedious process of manual rule-checking, you can focus entirely on the quality of your research.
With Compliance Validation, you can navigate the complexities of diverse journal requirements with ease, allowing you to submit your work with the absolute confidence that it meets every professional standard.

Key Benefits

Fewer desk rejections
Structural and formatting errors are the most preventable reason manuscripts don't make it past an editor's first pass. Flag them before submission, not after.

Real-time error flagging
Formulaic surfaces issues as you write (or on demand when you validate), so corrections stay small. No hunting through a finished draft at the end.

One place for journal requirements
The database includes requirements for hundreds of journals, updated regularly, without the need for manual searches through author guidelines pages.

More time for the actual research
Margin widths and citation formats shouldn't require your attention. Automating the rule-checking means mental bandwidth goes where it matters.

Flexibility for each unique case
For manuscripts that intentionally deviate from standard requirements, individual flags can be dismissed without affecting the rest of the validation.
See it in action
Catch any errors or omissions before the journal does.
Our reviews
11 out of 10 on journal reformatting. - Senior Medical Writer, Biotech
Frequently asked questions
Everything you need to know about our product.
Our database is synchronized monthly to reflect the latest changes in author guidelines, ensuring that even recent shifts in submission policy are captured by the validation engine.
Yes. You can switch between different journal rulesets to see how your manuscript measures up against various targets, which is particularly useful if you are considering a "Plan B" for submission.
The tool checks for a wide range of technicalities, including word counts (abstract and body), citation styles, required sections and subsections, image resolution requirements, and table formatting.
No, the Compliance Validation tool focuses on structural and guideline adherence.
At its core, acceptance depends on the peer-review process, the compatibility of the manuscript and journal scope, the quality of the research, and other factors, the Compliance Validation check significantly reduces the risk of "desk rejection" due to technical non-compliance.
When a violation is flagged, the tool provides a clear explanation of the rule and an actionable suggestion on how to fix it directly within your drafting interface. Flagged issues can be dismissed individually, as appropriate.



